Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Red Deck Wins | luffydochapeudepalha | 9-1 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12765769 |
| Gruul Aggro | mogged | 9-1 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12769892 |
| Gruul Aggro | mogged | 8-2 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12765784 |
| Rakdos Aggro | stalonge | 7-1 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12769901 |
| Red Deck Wins | numberonenoob | 8-2 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12769907 |
| Izzet Spellslingers | sanpop | 8-2 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12765784 |
| Red Deck Wins | kablewire | 8-2 | 2nd in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12769892 |
| Red Deck Wins | latorretta | 7-2 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12769073 |
| Gruul Aggro | mogged | 7-1 | None |
| Izzet Spellslingers | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
Big Red , Boros Aggro , Boros Auras , Boros Burn , Boros Discover , Boros Forge , Boros Mice , Boros Monument , Boros Recommission
Meta Performance Analysis
Burst Lightning ranks #45 out of approximately 405 cards in raw efficiency (top 11%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Red average: 63.1%
Performance compared to other Red cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Burst Lightning is a very strong card that performs well in most contexts.
Recommended number of copies: 3
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 47.23 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 1 mana, the average win rate in the format is 76.2%. Burst Lightning has a win rate of 76.5%, making it 0.5% better than other 1-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slick Sequence | Instant | 17 | 91.0% | 13 |
| Third Path Iconoclast | Creature — Human Monk | 34 | 84.2% | 19 |
| Bulwark Ox | Creature — Ox Mount | 5 | 80.0% | 3 |
| Bruse Tarl, Roving Rancher | Legendary Creature — Human Warrior | 6 | 77.4% | 3 |
| Heritage Reclamation | Instant | 10 | 77.1% | 4 |
| Stock Up | Sorcery | 103 | 74.6% | 44 |
| Cori-Steel Cutter | Artifact — Equipment | 139 | 73.9% | 63 |
| Crumb and Get It | Instant | 7 | 73.8% | 4 |
| Bounce Off | Instant | 28 | 71.5% | 16 |
| Furnace Reins | Sorcery | 24 | 70.4% | 12 |
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Burst Lightning than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slick Sequence | Instant | 2 | 14 | 88.0% | 77.7% | +10.3% |
| Chandra, Spark Hunter | Legendary Planeswalker — Chandra | 4 | 7 | 83.7% | 76.6% | +7.2% |
| Disdainful Stroke | Instant | 2 | 19 | 82.3% | 75.9% | +6.4% |
| Shore Up | Instant | 1 | 29 | 85.7% | 79.4% | +6.3% |
| Stock Up | Sorcery | 3 | 82 | 82.2% | 76.2% | +6.0% |
| Turn Inside Out | Instant | 1 | 15 | 82.7% | 77.1% | +5.6% |
| Ral, Crackling Wit | Legendary Planeswalker — Ral | 4 | 10 | 82.4% | 77.0% | +5.3% |
| This Town Ain't Big Enough | Instant | 5 | 17 | 80.6% | 75.7% | +4.9% |
| Soul-Guide Lantern | Artifact | 1 | 7 | 79.3% | 74.7% | +4.6% |
| Spell Pierce | Instant | 1 | 90 | 81.2% | 76.8% | +4.5% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gruul Aggro | 1859 | 89.5% | 47.1% |
| Red Deck Wins | 1357 | 98.5% | 52.8% |
| Boros Burn | 368 | 93.9% | 47.0% |
| Izzet Spellslingers | 126 | 88.7% | 71.4% |
| Temur Otters | 112 | 33.3% | 41.8% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.